air to water v. air to air ic - Honda Prelude Forum - Prelude Online.com
Honda Prelude Forum Honda Prelude Forum Header Right
» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
» Wheel & Tire Center

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Go Back   Honda Prelude Forum - Prelude Online.com > Driveline Technical Discussion > Forced Induction
Register Home Forum Active Topics Photo Gallery Mark Forums Read Advertise

PreludeOnline.com is the premier Honda Prelude Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 07-04-2002, 11:31 AM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 35
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
air to water v. air to air ic

which ic do you guys think is better? Anyone with a air to water if so how is it?
darknight is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 07-04-2002, 01:16 PM   #2 (permalink)
Supporting Member
I'm your daddy
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tempe, Arizona
Posts: 633
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
An air-to-water intercooler would definitely be better. The best way would be to relocate the battery to the trunk and place the air-to-water intercooler in its place. This way, the pipes running from the compressor to the intercooler and to the throttle body will be much shorter. Not to mention the car would look a lot more sleeper since you won't see a front mount in the bumper opening.

The cooling efficiency of the air-to-water is much better than a air-to-air fmic. The reason most people stay away from it is because it's too expensive and generally unnecessary. But i'd still get one if I had money to burn.
__________________
Jeremy... some call me Jet


AIM: Original Jigalo
AsianPersuasion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2002, 01:34 PM   #3 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 35
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
thanks for the info. i got cheaper prices on air to water then a big air to air ic. Do the water run out often though?
darknight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2002, 01:56 PM   #4 (permalink)
Supporting Member
Estoy Tranquilo
 
red92si's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: The LBC
Posts: 3,866
iTrader: (3)
Feedback Score: 3 reviews
For the Air-Water you would either have to have a huge tank of ice water located somewhere in the car to have running through IC to cool the intake charge. Or you would have to buy another smaller radiator and route the IC to flow its fuid through that to cool it back down. The IC's themselves may be cheaper than a FMIC, but you have to buy alot more other stuff.
__________________

Tyler
red92si is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2002, 04:33 PM   #5 (permalink)
00G
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 806
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
I would dare say the air to air is more efficient for daily driving. The air to water is best for drag racing apps. After heating the water during daily driving, it takes longer to cool to ambient (without the use of ice or a/c routing to the sump) and the commonly used radiators aren't very big. Once the water has been warmed from driving, it will take much more time to bring the temps down.

For all out drag racing, a little ice in the reservoir goes a long and powerfull way. The IC is the same material, so efficiency is similar with less surface area in the air/water vs. air/air. Once moving, the air/air cools immediately and the air/water would have to cool the heated water down before the charge air will cool. There are many good versions of air/water ICs, but after plumbing, parts, and work, the costs and (without the use of ice) benefits are near or more expensive with the air/water and a bit more weight...

I'd like an air/water and try some peltiers to keep the water cold.... a science project, hehehe.....
__________________
00G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2002, 05:27 PM   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 75
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
air to air is a better idea for daily street driving.
air to water is better for drag.
the cost of the actual intercoolers is roughly the same...but the actual components needed to make an air to water intercooler work is where it gets tough. you'll need a water reservoir, a water pump, and a radiator.
i'm running the air to liquid on my car (not installed yet) because i want maximum power at the track.
__________________
1995 Honda Prelude SR-V Turbo


11's here i come...
kidkutz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2002, 06:02 PM   #7 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 35
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
but doesnt the air to water give you alot more power at the same amount of boost levels? Does anyone have any dynos on one w air to air and one on air to water
darknight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2002, 02:53 PM   #8 (permalink)
used to sell mix tapes
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: San Francisco, CA USA
Posts: 5,442
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
if the intake temp is the same, the power is the same regardless of how it's cooled at any given psi. the question is, which can cool to the ambient temp in various conditions, and which presents a lower pressure drop...

anyone know what the pressure drop across your usual air to water IC is?

Quote:
Originally posted by darknight
but doesnt the air to water give you alot more power at the same amount of boost levels? Does anyone have any dynos on one w air to air and one on air to water
__________________
"AIDS is not just God's punishment for homosexuals; it is God's punishment for the society that tolerates homosexuals." R.I.P. Jerry Falwell.
schwett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2002, 04:36 PM   #9 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 75
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
__________________
1995 Honda Prelude SR-V Turbo


11's here i come...
kidkutz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2002, 05:50 PM   #10 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 169
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Its as simple as this. Air-water if you're drag racing. Air-air if its a street car. Ignore Dyno charts, because they're inaccurate for real-life street driving. On the dyno an air-water filled with ice in the resorvior will run significantly more power than an air-air. But, once you drive for a good number of miles the water temp becomes the same as the air temp causing absolutely no improvement. Yes, if you have a smaller radiator installed for the water also, it will help, but just go air-air on street applications. Proven to work the best, so go with it.

Marcus
98turboSH is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Honda Prelude Forum - Prelude Online.com > Driveline Technical Discussion > Forced Induction


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:27 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2