Sway Bar Choices - Honda Prelude Forum - Prelude Online.com
Honda Prelude Forum Honda Prelude Forum Header Right
» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
» Wheel & Tire Center

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Go Back   Honda Prelude Forum - Prelude Online.com > Honda Prelude Discussion > Fourth Gen Prelude Discussion
Register Home Forum Active Topics Photo Gallery Mark Forums Read Advertise

PreludeOnline.com is the premier Honda Prelude Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
View Poll Results: what front and rear sway bars are the best for a reasonable price?
Neuspeed 3 25.00%
Suspension Techniques 6 50.00%
Tanabe 1 8.33%
Progress 2 16.67%
Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 12-04-2003, 02:41 PM   #1 (permalink)
Supporting Member
PreludeOnline Premium Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,354
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Sway Bar Choices

i wanted to find out everyones opinions on different strut bars. i know theres a wide variety but i dont want the cheap ones, only quality. on my list is the suspension techniques front and rear decently priced for $250, then theres neuspeed for a ridiculous prices, like $350 for just the rear! then theres other sway bars like progress. dont know too much about tanabe. is there any good ones i missed?

i know neuspeed is gonna be the best but the prices are just ridiculous so i guess im asking whats the next best thing.

anyway, ide like this topic to be dedicated to sway bars and which brand to choose for front and rear. ide like to get them soon to match my new neuspeed front strut bar. hopefully we can agree on a final verdict (i know that would never happen lol)
MidNiteMysT is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 12-04-2003, 04:23 PM   #2 (permalink)
Supporting Member
pretending to drive...
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Verona, NJ
Posts: 466
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
I have the suspension techniques rear bar on my 94 & the front bar is stock...
luder94si is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2003, 04:01 AM   #3 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bonney Lake, WA
Posts: 285
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
I've considered getting a thicker rear one and removing the front because I'm so sick of understeer... oh well that's life in a Honda I supose. As soon as I have tried one or more I'll vote.
__________________
preluda92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2003, 09:02 PM   #4 (permalink)
Supporting Member
PreludeOnline Premium Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,354
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
i know a lot more of you have thoughts on sway bars. lets make this thread the definitive source for sway bar info and opinion. do it once and do it right. then when someone does a search, this will answer their sway bar question.
MidNiteMysT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2003, 11:56 PM   #5 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: sunny socal
Posts: 1,733
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
it all depends on what application you are going for... a poll like this has no difinitive answer until we know why you want sway bars in the first place.
Lucke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2003, 09:45 AM   #6 (permalink)
Supporting Member
PreludeOnline Premium Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,354
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
just basically so i can handle better. im not gonna autocross the car or plan to do that yet. i just want what sway bars are supposed to do, get rid of body roll

checked out a bunch of reviews on the ST sway bars and most of em are good except for the instalation and instructions. the review were all for civics and accords tho. a question i have is do you have to drill any holes to put in the ST sway bars or they go in the stock location? because some of the installations required you drill and i def dont want to drill. and also, does the sway bar hit the exhaust pipe sometimes at all? maybe if the car is lowered which i plan to do? so does anyone know that about the ST sway bars?

and btw, whats tanabes website??

Last edited by MidNiteMysT; 12-06-2003 at 10:39 AM.
MidNiteMysT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2003, 11:17 AM   #7 (permalink)
Supporting Member
Team BlenderBlaster / H2
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: chicago
Posts: 146
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
First of all, you need to ask yourself what are all the suspension mods you will eventually do. I feel that limiting body roll can be done with shocks and springs plus get the added benefit of a better ride too.

If that is not in your future, then a front strut bar and a larger rear sway bar will help a little with the body roll and balance around corners. Neuspeed makes a great front strut bar and progress rear sway is also great. The adjustability will help as you further mod your suspension down the line.
vtecspd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2003, 12:06 PM   #8 (permalink)
Supporting Member
PreludeOnline Premium Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,354
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
well i have tein ss coilovers thats gonna be on the car but ide like the sway bars on the car too to help even more with stifness of the car. and i just ordered a neuspeed front strut bar. im not planning to do too much more for my suspension unless maybe some tie bars and sway bars. thats about it.
MidNiteMysT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2003, 12:46 PM   #9 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 3,285
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
I am running Tein SS with some Falken 451 rubber and the car holds the road SOOO well its amazing. I have the Teins on 14/14, and for anyone who thinks dampening adjustment doesnt change much, you are sorrily mistaken. The car has a completely different personality on 14 than on 8. Very noticable if you are in tune with your car.

I got a Spoon FSTB for xmas, and would like to order the read after xmas, then I am looking into a rear sway. But there is one thing I am not quite sure about. I hear everyone saying how the rear bar will help to bring the back end around....is it just me or does that not make much sense? lol. When I am pushing my car hard, I dont ever think to myself "Gosh, sure wish the back end would swing around a bit". I do a lot of high speed driving such as high speed runs through the mountains which have anywhere from 35-105mph turns. So my question is....is a rear sway mostly for autox'ers who want the rear to rotate a bit on the tight courses?
__________________
-Jeremy | Forbidden Motorsports

Yes....I'm back on PO!
4bidden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2003, 01:12 PM   #10 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: sunny socal
Posts: 1,733
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
the purpose of adding a super stiff rear sway bar and eliminating the front is to get rid of the understeer associated with FF cars (like it was said above). FF cars have understeer, and FR cars have a tendency to oversteer.

eliminating understeer will make our cars handle more neutral and in turn, handle better around corners.
Lucke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2003, 01:32 PM   #11 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 3,285
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Then why are rear sways always said to increase "rotation"?
__________________
-Jeremy | Forbidden Motorsports

Yes....I'm back on PO!
4bidden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2003, 01:40 PM   #12 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: sunny socal
Posts: 1,733
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
it does, when we go into a corner we have to steer pretty constant to clear it because of the body roll that we have. a stiffer rear bar gets the roll out of the rear so that the back end is even more in line with the front, thus eliminating the body roll of the rear section of the car. thats why its said to "toss out" the rear, but since we have no power going to the rear wheels, the only way it slides out is due to the inertia and the angle of the turn in.

because we have no power going to the rear wheels, we can't have very much oversteer at all, so it basically neutralizes the understeer making the whole rear of the car "act" more like AWD in a way.

IM me if this still didn't clear it up

Last edited by Lucke; 12-06-2003 at 01:44 PM.
Lucke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2003, 10:30 PM   #13 (permalink)
Supporting Member
PreludeOnline Premium Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Auburn, AL
Posts: 486
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
^ wow thats really informative, but is this the best application for daily driving?
__________________
Go Braves!
blacklude4k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2003, 10:36 PM   #14 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: sunny socal
Posts: 1,733
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
the best application for daily driving is what ever you feel comfortable with.

if you're used to understeer, then driving with both sway bars on is good. if you dont' drive too hard before you get used to the more "neutral" steering then you'll get used to driving like that... just think of it like learning how to drive, you can always get used to the feeling of something, as long as you don't push it before you're ready...
Lucke is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Honda Prelude Forum - Prelude Online.com > Honda Prelude Discussion > Fourth Gen Prelude Discussion


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:57 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2