SMSP Header and Custom Exhaust Installed - Honda Prelude Forum - Prelude Online.com
Honda Prelude Forum Honda Prelude Forum Header Right
» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
» Wheel & Tire Center

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Go Back   Honda Prelude Forum - Prelude Online.com > Honda Prelude Discussion > Fifth Gen Prelude Discussion
Register Home Forum Active Topics Photo Gallery Mark Forums Read Advertise

PreludeOnline.com is the premier Honda Prelude Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 07-05-2004, 07:38 PM   #1 (permalink)
Supporting Member
Menschkeit: True.
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 675
iTrader: (2)
Feedback Score: 2 reviews
SMSP Header and Custom Exhaust Installed

Hey guys,

I finally had the time to install the SMSP and all the exhaust components I had collected. See my other thread for more info.

First, don't ask me how the SMSP header is. I'm not yet ready to give a full review of the header, since there are a few other things to work out on my car first. I just had a timing belt installed, which I think is on WAY too tight (i have the supercharger whine even at idle), and the car has been feeling restrained ever since. Want to get that fixed first. Then I have to wire up my VAFC2. Then dyno. So it will be a while before you see dyno results.

My initial impression of the header is that it definitely increases power at and after VTEC. The torque curve feels like it was smoothened out. Low and midrange power feel like they've decreased. We'll see.


Now, for the exhaust components I chose to go along with the SMSP. Here's a pic of the install:

[img]http://www.*********************.com/wetoddimage.wtdr/wNDYyNzQ2NnM0MTNkZmQzMXk1NDE%3D.jpg[/img]

My objective was to design the quietest straight through exhaust possible. Worked a lot with Daemione in choosing the components. Here's full parts list:

- SMSP Header
- Carsound 94406 Cat with built in resonator (from fulllineexhaust.com)
- 2 Magnaflow 1446 14" resonators (from fulllineexhaust.com)
- Magnaflow 14246 5x8x18" muffler (from fullineexhaust)
- 2 90 degree SS bends, 2 45 degree SS bends, and 3 ft of straight stainless steel tubing (from Vertex Industries, Inc.)

As you can see, all these parts fit in there no problem at all, so we know an install with these components is perfectly possible. Running the car, there is absolutely no rubbing, vibrating, or clanging. Now, for those considering these components for a similar install, here's the

Review of the exhaust:

At idle:
Deep smooth constant bass tone, slightly louder than stock. Very nice.

Revving in neutral:
Deep bass increases in pitch and volume. Never gets raspy or farty, remains silky smooth. Significantly louder than stock, but not obnoxiously loud.

Cruising:
Ranges from silent to very slight bass drone while cruising at a constant speed, no matter what the speed is. Slight drone appears at 70-80mph if the car is working hard to maintain speed. Otherwise it is pretty much like the Apexi WS, being nearly silent to having a pleasing almost imperceptible bass hum.

Accelerating:
Bass acquires a booming quality on acceleration, and volume of bass increases. Again, does not become raspy, bass just becomes boomier and louder. This happens with any acceleration, no matter how slight. Any minimal work the car does, the bass drone appears and booming increases. Booming is loud.

Decelerating:
Letting off the accelerator at any speeds also result in moderate bass boom. If cruising, exhaust is silent; when let off accelerator, bass booms. A little loud for my taste, but still pleasing. Could definitely live with it.


My overall conclusion? From what I've heard, this setup is probably very similar to the Thermal, mostly because of the awesome deep bass. In spite of its quality (never raspy or obnoxious), this setup is still probably not acceptable to me, although will probably be fine with many people. I love the deepness of it, but what kills it for me is its booming quality on any acceleration no matter how slight. The booming does draw attention, so it's a no go in my book.

I put a lot of though into alternatives and made many measurements. The main idea was to add the Moroso Spiral Flow muffler/resonator, which by some accounts on the web removes drone. Also shaped like a 4" dia bullet. However, in our cars, these is no space to add this either after the 2nd 90 degree turn, or the axle back section. You could, but the resonator will hang way too low. I could replace one of the magnaflow resonators with the moroso, but there's no guarantee this will work.

I will definitely now add dual resonated tips to hopefully quiet it down some, have ordered it from californiamufflers.com.

Next step: I'm now very heavily considering the Hytech twin loop muffler instead of the magnaflow can. Will wait for Artifex's review hopefully coming soon!
__________________
Check out my for sale thread.

Last edited by devtec; 07-05-2004 at 11:29 PM.
devtec is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 07-05-2004, 07:57 PM   #2 (permalink)
Supporting Member
I'm your daddy
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tempe, Arizona
Posts: 633
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
man... no offense but some of those bends right before the muffler look like crap.

The overall welding looks like crap too.

I DO hope you get some real power though
__________________
Jeremy... some call me Jet


AIM: Original Jigalo
AsianPersuasion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2004, 08:21 PM   #3 (permalink)
Supporting Member
Menschkeit: True.
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 675
iTrader: (2)
Feedback Score: 2 reviews
the bends right before the muffler are fine, and the geometry actually worked out perfectly. the two welds you see are two 45s together in an S, this may be what's looking crappy to you. unfortunately none of these are TIG welds; that would have cost a fortune.
__________________
Check out my for sale thread.
devtec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2004, 08:39 PM   #4 (permalink)
Supporting Member
I'm your daddy
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tempe, Arizona
Posts: 633
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
well... those 45's just have a sharp elbow and that kinda bothers me. I just hope it's not killing your performance
__________________
Jeremy... some call me Jet


AIM: Original Jigalo
AsianPersuasion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2004, 09:44 PM   #5 (permalink)
Supporting Member
PreludeOnline Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 94
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
You'll need to replace the joint after the flange. It looks like you mitered that joint which is a no-no.

Was the mig welder set up for stainless or mild steel?

Also, when you butt weld stainless to stainless they better have purged the tubing.

Last edited by SMSP; 07-05-2004 at 09:51 PM.
SMSP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2004, 10:27 PM   #6 (permalink)
Supporting Member
Menschkeit: True.
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 675
iTrader: (2)
Feedback Score: 2 reviews
yeah, i will have them put in another 45 at the miter.
__________________
Check out my for sale thread.
devtec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2004, 10:46 PM   #7 (permalink)
Supporting Member
Eh. :(
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,266
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
My understanding of resonators is that they tend to work on a few frequencies depending on the size and shape. I would think two resonators of the same size/design would not be more effective than two resonators of different design.

Try replacing one of the magnaflows with a moroso.

Also, no way around it, but baffled mufflers are always quieter than straight-through.

Like your photographic technique!
Was it still on lifts?
alphajesse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2004, 11:21 PM   #8 (permalink)
Supporting Member
Menschkeit: True.
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 675
iTrader: (2)
Feedback Score: 2 reviews
yeah alphajesse, you may be right. Much earlier on, Daemione and I were considering your point, and I think we ended up concluding that deadening is directly proportional to just the entire length of resonator. More length (sound absorbing surface area) = less sound. so that's why i chose what i did. but this was by no means a definitive conclusion. maybe i should replace one of the magnaflows with the spiral flow?

Anybody else know more about this than I do? Dave (SMSP), any theory you could teach us about, and any concrete suggestions for this particular case?

To me, using the moroso would definitely be preferable and cheaper than getting the Hytech twin loop. It would definitely add some back pressure too, which I wonder might help with restoring some of the low-midrange loss i'm subjectively feeling.

If someone can give me a good rationale, i'll swap one of the magnaflows for a moroso.

btw, yes, it was on lifts, and using a baffled system on the SMSP would be a crime!
__________________
Check out my for sale thread.

Last edited by devtec; 07-05-2004 at 11:23 PM.
devtec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2004, 11:47 PM   #9 (permalink)
Supporting Member
JRSC = Hot-Lude
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Valencia, CA (SoCal)
Posts: 1,930
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally posted by devtec
It would definitely add some back pressure too, which I wonder might help with restoring some of the low-midrange loss i'm subjectively feeling.
You don't ever want more back pressure. Wait until you tune it and hopefully the proper a/f ratio will regain your low-midrange back.
__________________
Kool-Lude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2004, 11:54 PM   #10 (permalink)
Supporting Member
Eh. :(
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,266
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally posted by devtec
yeah alphajesse, you may be right. Much earlier on, Daemione and I were considering your point, and I think we ended up concluding that deadening is directly proportional to just the entire length of resonator. More length (sound absorbing surface area) = less sound. so that's why i chose what i did. but this was by no means a definitive conclusion. maybe i should replace one of the magnaflows with the spiral flow?

Anybody else know more about this than I do? Dave (SMSP), any theory you could teach us about, and any concrete suggestions for this particular case?

To me, using the moroso would definitely be preferable and cheaper than getting the Hytech twin loop. It would definitely add some back pressure too, which I wonder might help with restoring some of the low-midrange loss i'm subjectively feeling.

If someone can give me a good rationale, i'll swap one of the magnaflows for a moroso.

btw, yes, it was on lifts, and using a baffled system on the SMSP would be a crime!
Here's my rationale- Resonators tend to be tuned to eliminate specific frequencies (hence "RESONATOR") while mufflers are designed to reduce sound levels at all frequencies. Since you have two identical resonators, you are duplicating (unnesacarily) functionality. Replacing one of the magnaflows with a second resonator of different design will probably realize a positive change in sound damping.

I suggest replacing the second magnaflow, as I have heard from several moroso users that they don't fare too well being right off of the header (though this was on boosted cars running test pipes.)
alphajesse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2004, 04:15 AM   #11 (permalink)
Supporting Member
Menschkeit: True.
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 675
iTrader: (2)
Feedback Score: 2 reviews
alpha, could you please put me in touch with these other moroso users, or find out for me what exactly they think of the spiral flow? I'd like to know in more detail how exactly they alter the exhaust sound, and if they would accomplish the reduction in booming/droning that I am looking for. I've also heard the same thing from other forums that the spiral flows do better downstream.

thanks,
dev
__________________
Check out my for sale thread.

Last edited by devtec; 07-06-2004 at 06:27 AM.
devtec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2004, 11:16 AM   #12 (permalink)
Supporting Member
Eh. :(
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,266
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Well the guy I know with one has a JSRC lude. He liked the sound reduction of the moroso, but it broke on him.
His was mounted in place of the cat on a car that has really high EGTs, but after removing the first part that turned into a rattle, it still works well, and he likes it.

He thinks it would have been fine if it was a bit farther from his (coated) header.

He ultimately replaced his straight-through muffler with a chambered muffler, though as his car is SUPER noisy.
alphajesse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2004, 08:36 AM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Framingham, MA
Posts: 4,107
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Dev, looks good - and good review of the sound quality as well. Too bad it didn't come out as quiet as we both hoped it would.

I see you ended up going with the resonated cat as well, very cool. Fit with no problems, I see. How much did fitting the O2 bungs on cost? Actually - where's your primary O2 sensor? I don't see it in the picture.

With the resonated tips, how far are they going to stick out past the bumper? californiamuffler has them listed as 9" tips . . . . seems like that'd stick out pretty far using the 18" magnaflow can back there.

Quote:
Originally posted by alphajesse
Here's my rationale- Resonators tend to be tuned to eliminate specific frequencies (hence "RESONATOR") while mufflers are designed to reduce sound levels at all frequencies. Since you have two identical resonators, you are duplicating (unnesacarily) functionality. Replacing one of the magnaflows with a second resonator of different design will probably realize a positive change in sound damping.
Well, the thing is - the magnaflow resonators don't actually use resonation to cancel frequencies. They're just smaller diameter versions of their mufflers, which use the absorption (sp?) technique.
__________________
--- This message was not sent from a phone ---
Daemione is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2004, 09:02 AM   #14 (permalink)
street racing instructor
 
Artifex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,387
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally posted by devtec
alpha, could you please put me in touch with these other moroso users, or find out for me what exactly they think of the spiral flow? I'd like to know in more detail how exactly they alter the exhaust sound, and if they would accomplish the reduction in booming/droning that I am looking for. I've also heard the same thing from other forums that the spiral flows do better downstream.

thanks,
dev
I think the issue is not that the Moroso performs poorly, but that it falls apart. Personally, I would not put it on any car, because I believe the welds are crap. Check this: http://www.theoldone.com/forum/topic...chTerms=moroso
If it were me I would not want to chance it. It it breaks, you have to unbolt/cut your exhaust out and put a new one in, which is $$$ to your installer.

My information as far as resonators go is that longer is better. I am using a 30" cherry bomb (a Magnaflow Thrush glasspack), which does a reasonably good job. I can't really tell until I get the new muffler on.
__________________
I am not an active moderator on this site anymore. Please contact Phryxis or liquidxnitez for help with your issues.
Artifex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2004, 09:21 AM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Framingham, MA
Posts: 4,107
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally posted by Artifex
I think the issue is not that the Moroso performs poorly, but that it falls apart. Personally, I would not put it on any car, because I believe the welds are crap. Check this: http://www.theoldone.com/forum/topic...chTerms=moroso
Yeah, that's what I've heard as well (basically from the same source(s). Sucks that there's only a small sample size to base it on, though. I wonder how much it would help mounting it downstream of the cat & primary resonator.

I'm still undecided as to whether I'm going to use mine.

Quote:
My information as far as resonators go is that longer is better. I am using a 30" cherry bomb (a Magnaflow Thrush glasspack), which does a reasonably good job. I can't really tell until I get the new muffler on.
So you've been driving w/ just the glasspack? What's that like? Or do you still have your cruddy muffler on?
__________________
--- This message was not sent from a phone ---
Daemione is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2004, 11:20 AM   #16 (permalink)
street racing instructor
 
Artifex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,387
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally posted by Daemione
So you've been driving w/ just the glasspack? What's that like? Or do you still have your cruddy muffler on?
Crappy muffler is still there. It looks like the holdup now is the stupid exhaust tip vendor. He just dropped something in the mail today that he should have mailed last Friday. I probably won't get the part until Monday of next week, which is really going to suck. I was hoping for an exhaust install on Friday.

More on topic for the original question though is that fact that a longer glasspack definitely helps. It lowered the tone compared to the 20" one I had on originally. I can't say what the difference would be with two smaller ones though.
__________________
I am not an active moderator on this site anymore. Please contact Phryxis or liquidxnitez for help with your issues.
Artifex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2004, 12:07 PM   #17 (permalink)
Supporting Member
Menschkeit: True.
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 675
iTrader: (2)
Feedback Score: 2 reviews
hey guys,

sucks about the ordering mishap, artifex.

daemione, yeah, the tips are 9" long, but luckily we were able to place the magnaflow can a lot further forward than I thought. the tip you see on now is 7.25", and actually sticks out shorter than stock. So i probably have about 8" to work with, and figure I can easily cut off 1-2" of the exhaust tip inlet. it should work out perfectly, actually.

but....

that's if i decide to stick with the magnaflow can. cause I may still do the hytech muffler. so crazy that this will add over $400 to the cost, but i guess that's what has to be done to get what we want. (and this will be my last car fling for a while ).

but if we can scrounge up more evidence, maybe i will try replacing the 2nd magnaflow 4" resonator with the moroso. i've seen a handful of 90% positive reviews on them, mostly from domestic truck (f150) and car (corvette, trans am) forums. most say it does quiet down things, and one said it got rid of highway drone.

FWIW, none of them mentioned the spiral flow falling apart. for some reason, i can't get into that old one forum to see what you guys are talking about.

we need more data!!! daemione, what will your decision to use the moroso depend on?
__________________
Check out my for sale thread.

Last edited by devtec; 07-07-2004 at 07:38 PM.
devtec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2004, 12:21 PM   #18 (permalink)
Supporting Member
Menschkeit: True.
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 675
iTrader: (2)
Feedback Score: 2 reviews
few more things i forgot,

re the tips again, i'm actually not expecting them to do that much. from what i've read, resonated tips are better at getting rid of high pitched sounds, reducing the raspiness of the exhaust and resulting in a more "mellow" tone. sound reduction is via reducing high pitched frequencies, not really by reducing overall volume. i think. since my system is all bass, it may not do much. but at least i'll get my dual tips.

the primary o2 sensor actually inserts on the SMSP right before the flange leading to the cat. good eye dave, ahah. the pic of that section in the composite i made was actually taken midway through, before i wired up the sensors at the end. but on the smsp, about an inch and a half from that flange ends up being exactly the stock location.

for those building a custom exhaust, do not purchase your hardware mail order, prices are inflated at least 3 if not 10 fold. i got my flanges and o2 bung for just a few dollars a piece at a local muffler shop. call around or even just stop by. lots of work but worth it.

last thing, if the issue with the moroso is durability, then an alternative is the Twister made by flopro (flopro.com/twister). it's the same damn thing. don't know if its welds are better, but at least it's an alternative. cheaper, too (34.95). daemione, i thought you said the welds look pretty good on yours...
__________________
Check out my for sale thread.
devtec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2004, 01:16 PM   #19 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Framingham, MA
Posts: 4,107
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally posted by devtec
daemione, i thought you said the welds look pretty good on yours...
Naw, they're only okay . . . .

The welds on my Magnaflow muffler are much cleaner.

But I don't think anyone's had a major spot like that break - the problems have been with the fins inside. And there's no real way to see inside to check the quality of those welds.

Right now I'm leaning toward getting the 18/24" resonator (instead of the 22/28"), and then fitting the moroso after it. Hopefully that'll be far enough downstream to prevent welds from failing as a result of heat.
__________________
--- This message was not sent from a phone ---
Daemione is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2004, 04:06 PM   #20 (permalink)
Supporting Member
Eh. :(
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,266
iTrader: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
The people who have reported having them brake ran them right off the header.
The people who have had no problems run them farther back in the exhaust system.

Most imports have higher EGTs to begin with, forget about n2o, turbo or SCed cars. It should be fine if you replace the 2nd magnaflow with it.

It looks like the only difference on the flowpro is that the moroso has breaks in the 'spiral' where the flowpro is continous. I cannot make a judgement on which is better, though.
alphajesse is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Honda Prelude Forum - Prelude Online.com > Honda Prelude Discussion > Fifth Gen Prelude Discussion


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:09 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2