Quote:
Originally posted by Hyojiggy
0 camber is not best??? factory comes with 0 and they say its ok as long as it;'s between -0.5 and +0.5 why would they have it at 0?
|
Depends on what's "best" for how you drive it. If you drive the car conservatively, 0 camber will keep the edges of the tires from wearing unevenly and will handle just fine. If you push the car a lot, with 0 camber the outsides will actually wear more and you won't have as much grip as possible. If you autocross every weekend, the outsides of your tires will be bald with 0 camber long before the rest of the tire, plus you'll be cursing the car for having the grip of a Tercel compared to your counterparts. For me, lowered about an inch with about -1 degrees camber, I'm still wearing the outsides of the tires faster than the center and insides because I autocross it every other weekend. I could actually use -2 or so and that would give me even tire wear.
Honda figures they basically have 2 choices (keep in mind the camber is not really adjustable in our car, it says "check for bent components" if it's out of spec). They can sell a car with 0 camber that will not wear the tires out unusually for the average daily driver and will pull .83 g's on a skidpad. Or they can sell a car with some negative camber that will wear out tires in 15000 miles in normal driving but will pull .86 g's (I'm kind of pulling these numbers out of my ass, but they are probably not way off). Most people will never surpass a sustained .7 g's more than a once a month (and might be ****ting their pants while doing so) so Honda figures they better not piss these people off by selling them a car that will wear out tires in 15000 miles, and so they lean towards the 0 camber option.