So obviously Honda knows that they screwed up when they designed the auto tensioner. So my ? is this, have they done something new to them to make them more reliable? I would assume they realized that they had an engineering flaw and now made the new ones differently. I'm still debating on whether to go with the auto or manual tensioner when I do my timing belt.
I haven't had any timing belt jobs come back where I've used the new autotensioner. They changed them so long ago, that I really doubt any of the old PN are still in circulation. If you're using aftermarket valvetrain or cams, I'd still switch to a manual tensioner, though.
Here is the part # my buddy gave me for the auto tensioner. He is getting me all of the parts at cost.
14520-P13-013
So since the car is mostly stock, I plan on selling it before I hit 100K and I am changing the timing belt at 70K the auto tensioner wouldn't be a bad choice. Just put it back together the way it was and move on????????
I went with a manual even though I'm mostly stock. I'm wondering what the adjustment intervals are on it? In over a year of driving the belt tension is still like new and I don't have any weird noises like I did with the faulty auto tensioner.
I also went with a manual from all of the horror stories I heard. I thought I'd rather pay a little more and have the reliability of it. Personal preferenace I assume.
The AutoGuide.com network consists of the largest network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
AutoGuide.com provides the latest car reviews, auto show coverage, new car prices, and automotive news. The AutoGuide network operates more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share opinions as a community.