Oh I think I see what you're saying.. So, because the shocks are now trying to "throw" the car back the other way harder, it puts more stress on the tires to bring them to their traction limit (and thus be quicker to swing out). Makes sense. But the other way I talked about still kinda makes sense to me too. Not just cuz of the reasoning I stated but also cuz I've read it elsewhere and my super-handling-obsessed tuner friend says the same thing too.
Perhaps both principles work but depends on the driving style? For those who want to break the rear wheel traction loose to make turns, stiffer rear would be better. But then perhaps for a less aggressive driver softer rears would be better since, if they fail to generate enough lateral g-force to break the traction limit, then they just created all this resistance to moving in that direction. Ack, my head hurts now. Well I do agree with your reasoning and will try it out on my next mountain run. But whatever, I don't think I really notice much difference either way so heck, I'll just set em even and be done with it.
In any case, I normally run 3 of 4, front and 2 of 4 rear. I have the fronts relatively stiff to help avoid bottoming out that heavy front end of ours and the rears less stiff simply for comfort (and then I stiffen the rear when going out to the runs ^_~)