View Single Post
Old 10-14-2003, 12:39 AM   #66 (permalink)
THEDREAD
Supporting Member
PreludeOnline Premium Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: LA, CA
Posts: 109
iTrader: (0)
No doubt if you have a "good" engine the jrsc is more cost effective. However, if you have a high mileage 93 to 96 lude (not supported by jr) then the cost difference becomes insignificant. I've seen dynos of ludes costing from $4000 to $8000 with SAE HP in the 210 to 230 ranges built by JG Engine Dynamics, Prospeed, and Erick's Racing (all from SC). The critical components in all cases were higher compression, cams, head work, and lots of dyno tuning. Unfortunately, most of the owners are not members of our site.
THEDREAD is offline   Reply With Quote